Re: Redspace Theory peer review
Posted:
Sun Jan 03, 2016 2:57 pmby warbrand2
Brandy Draca posts
hmm, sounds feasible. would likely just need a light grey slime core and a syringe filled with coffee. Uh at least that should work in theory.
Re: Redspace Theory peer review
Posted:
Sun Jan 03, 2016 3:01 pmby Aces
warbrand2 wrote:Brandy Draca posts
hmm, sounds feasible. would likely just need a light grey slime core and a syringe filled with coffee. Uh at least that should work in theory.
Jeremiah Acacius posted:Kinda derailing the thread, guys.
Re: Redspace Theory peer review
Posted:
Mon Jan 04, 2016 12:11 amby jemli
Rrrr Hadii posted:
While I do appreciate the merits of a good discussion, I note the lack of any sort of useful critique of my theories. Was it that I was posting something that's regarded as common knowledge at this point?
Re: Redspace Theory peer review
Posted:
Tue Jan 05, 2016 11:54 amby orbisa
Dr. Richard D'angelo posted:
I believe the lack of critique is mostly due to the little amount of experiments to comfirm or deny such proclamations, what you propose is sound and does fit our little understanding of the red fields as far as I can tell, but hard to disprovee or prove for certain. It would be nice of you if you could offer us a practical exercise to comfirm your theory.
And while I do agree with your work, there has been some works lately, done by geneticists, that demostrate that size can be altered permanently with the same ease we can alter gender or hair color. Pershaps dna is also connected to this puzzle?